Re: Editorial issues from today's call (ACTION-483, ACTION-485)

On 2008-06-11 20:16:11 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> ACTION-483 was about the double negation in the end of the petnames
> text; now changed as follows:

Make that "in the end of the self-signed certs text, right above
petnames".  Sorry.

>   <p>
>    If a client is able to automatically accept a self-signed
>    certificate, or recover from similar problem without user
>    interaction, it MUST support a mechanism to store and use
>    information about certificates that were previously encountered,
>    and to detect changes against historical usage of certificates as
>    described in more detail in section <specref
>    ref="sec-tlserrors"/>.
>   </p>
> 
> For context, see: 
>   http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#selfsignedcerts
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 18:19:01 UTC