Editorial issues from today's call (ACTION-483, ACTION-485)

I've checked in a version of the spec with today's editoral issues
fixed.

ACTION-485 was about the "don't show information +derived+ from
untrusted certs" clarification.

ACTION-483 was about the double negation in the end of the petnames
text; now changed as follows:

  <p>
   If a client is able to automatically accept a self-signed
   certificate, or recover from similar problem without user
   interaction, it MUST support a mechanism to store and use
   information about certificates that were previously encountered,
   and to detect changes against historical usage of certificates as
   described in more detail in section <specref
   ref="sec-tlserrors"/>.
  </p>

For context, see: 
  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#selfsignedcerts

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 18:16:47 UTC