W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: ACTION-451: text on extensions

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:54:10 +0200
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080606175410.GW553@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org>

Oh, URIs for context:

  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/451
  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/133
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008May/0055.html

On 2008-06-06 19:52:59 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:52:59 +0200
> Subject: ACTION-451: text on extensions
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
> I've merged the text on extensions (ISSUE-133) in to section 4 (the
> one on definitions), with some editorial changes to satisfy the gods
> of good grammar.
> 
> I'd suggest that we don't close ISSUE-133 quite yet, since this text
> mgiht (as discussed at the face-to-face) see some changes when I
> rewrite the overall conformance model section.
> 
> Or, put differently, I think ISSUE-133 also blocks on ACTION-446.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 17:54:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 17:54:46 GMT