Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-13

Regrets. I have a conflict. 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>

Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:43:34 
To:"public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-13



Regrets. At a conference.

Maritza Johnson wrote:
> Regrets, I have another meeting.
>
> -- Maritza
>
>     http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~maritzaj/

>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
>
>>
>>         Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
>>
>> Calling information:
>> Wednesday, 13 February 2008
>> 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings

>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080213

>>
>>
>> Agenda
>>
>> 1) Pick a scribe
>> Johnathan's on deck.
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing

>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes

>>
>> 2. Approve mintues from meetings
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/01/30-wsc-minutes

>>
>> 3) Weekly completed action items
>> [Pending review] ACTION-334: Anil Saldhana to propose language on
>> bookmark APIs - due 2008-01-24
>> [Pending review] ACTION-352: Thomas Roessler to request ISSUE-114 on
>> f2f agenda - due 2008-01-25
>> [Pending review] ACTION-360: Thomas Roessler to Editorial changes from
>> Mez' xit review of December 2007 - see Related notes - due 2008-01-25
>> [Pending review] ACTION-364: Thomas Roessler to remove non-interaction
>> certs while merging Stephen's rewrite - due 2008-02-06
>> [Pending review] ACTION-367: Tyler Close to Incorporate the editorial
>> change comments from Tim H's review into wsc-usecases - due 2008-01-28
>> [Pending review] ACTION-373: Mary Ellen Zurko to Poll al G about
>> shoulder surfing attacks in context of assistive technologies - due
>> 2008-01-23
>> [Pending review] ACTION-374: Tim Hahn to Rewrite page security score
>> section - due 2008-01-23
>> [Pending review] ACTION-375: Anil Saldhana to link from wsc-xit to
>> issues - due 2008-01-23
>> [Pending review] ACTION-377: Thomas Roessler to Change 7.8 to say
>> "need to ask user about change" - due 2008-01-30
>> [Pending review] ACTION-379: Thomas Roessler to Remove ISSUE-120
>> reference from ED - due 2008-01-31
>> [Pending review] ACTION-380: Thomas Roessler to Send email to list
>> regarding ISSUE-131 containing full text of new proposal, and will
>> close out the issue - due 2008-02-06
>> [Pending review] ACTION-381: Thomas Roessler to Change 9.5 in line
>> with ISSUE-130 discussion ago; close issue. - due 2008-02-06
>>
>> 4) Open Action Items
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0009.html

>>
>> 5) Action items closed due to inactivity
>> None.
>>
>> 6) Agenda bashing
>>
>> 7) Continue discussions of what in xit can go to LC in June
>> Need to discuss:
>> Section 7
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#ceremonies

>> Section 8.1.3
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#techniques-dontmix

>> Section 8.2
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#robustness-trustedpath

>> Parts of Section 9
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#authoringAndDeployment

>>
>> 8) Low fi prototyping of security confidence estimate
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score

>> There seemed to be general agreement that we would not go to LC with
>> anything that was not at least lo fi prototyped (unless it was the
>> sort of robustness recommendation where only lack of compliance could
>> be prototyped). Working through the prototyping of SCE in a meeting
>> seemed to be the only possibility for it to make it to LC in June.
>>
>> 9) Next meeting - 20 February 2008
>> I don't expect us to finish what's on this agenda; I expect we'll take
>> up where we leave off
>>

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:23:31 UTC