W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Tracking Last Call Comments

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:44:44 +0200
To: wdoyle@mitre.org, Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080814064444.GR383@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org>

Hi Bill,

Last Call comments are very slowly starting to appear, so I've
(finally!) remembered to add the Last Call Working Draft to
lc-comments-tracker.

  http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/

A version of the Working Draft that's annotated with the Last Call
comments we've gotten is here (it's automatically generated):

  http://w3.org/brief/OTM=

I entered the comments that I know of so far (two issues that I had
raised, and which are therefore already in tracker, plus four
comments that we received otherwise -- and which are all archived on
the public list --; these do not yet have issues associated).

So far, I believe that only one of the comments qualifies as
substantive; that's LC-2057:

  http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/2057

... concerning logotypes.

In playing with lc-comments-tracker, it turns out that the process
of using it is really *very* easy; it would be great if you could
take over at this point.

I don't remember, Mez, how you wanted to manage the process of
creating and resolving issues that are associated to comments.

My one preference in this would be that every edit that we make
going forward should have a tracker issue associated with it, so we
can track consensus more clearly.

Thanks,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2008 06:45:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 August 2008 06:45:24 GMT