W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > May 2007

RE: Agenda, Wednesay, 23 May, WSC Call

From: Bruno von Niman <ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:38:26 +0200
To: "'Thomas Roessler'" <tlr@w3.org>, "'Mary Ellen Zurko'" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001201c79cfc$95d75f80$b0b6a8c0@BMySony>

It's a good proposal by means of efficiency.

However, organizations (like ANEC, the one I represent) may have prepared input and comments with the upcoming F2F in mind (we did, they are ready but under Member's approval). The idea was to submit them just in time for Dublin and be able to address and possibly present them and provide further explanations, if necessary, in the meeting. 

As no submission deadline for the provision of comments on the current version has been communicated (and that should be done at least a few weeks before), I believe it would be procedurally wrong to release a new draft now, just before the Dublin F2F.

I suggest using a solid, updated editor's working group draft next week and releasing a new WG draft following next week's meeting instead. This is a firm standpoint.

I will unfortunately not be able to attend today's call but I'll be glad to answer any questions over email before the call.

Regards,
Bruno

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: den 22 maj 2007 17:32
To: Mary Ellen Zurko
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Agenda, Wednesay, 23 May, WSC Call


On 2007-05-22 07:54:12 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> 6) wsc-usecases update
> We've got one due in June. Talk through the process and status. 

Here's a proposal.  Let's decide on tomorrow's call that we publish
the current version ASAP as another Working Draft (if possible even
before the face-to-face), with the following "Status of this
Document" section (wordsmithing welcome):

  This is a W3C Working Draft of "Web Security Experience,
  Indicators and Trust: Scope and Use Cases", produced by the Web
  Security Context Working Group, as part of the Security Activity.
  
  The Working Group thanks those who have submitted comments against
  a previous version of this document.  While this iteration
  includes changes to address some of the issues raised, we do not
  imply that all were addressed, yet.

  Once all the issues about this document have been addressed, the
  Working Group intends to issue a Last Call, to work toward a final
  version of this document that is to be published as a W3C Working
  Group Note.
  
  Please send comments related to this document to
  public-usable-authentication@w3.org (public archive).
  
  Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the
  W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated,
  replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is
  inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
  
  This document was produced by a group operating under the 5
  February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. The group does not expect this
  document to become a W3C Recommendation. W3C maintains a public
  list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the
  deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions
  for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of
  a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s)
  must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the
  W3C Patent Policy.
  
Cheers
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 05:39:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:47 GMT