RE: Editing process for Recommendations

Hi Mez,
 
I'm also going to add my PII Editor bar proposal to our draft
recommendations. See:
 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PersonallyIdentifiableInformationEditorB
ar
 
Shawn and I spoke last week about splitting up editing tasks. I'm taking
care of finishing up the Note and he's going to get started on the
recommendations. I think he's going to setup a skeleton draft and move
the display recommendations from the wiki into the draft. I'll then add
my PII Editor bar content. I'm hoping all this gets done this week, so
that everyone can print a copy to take on the airplane with them.
 
Tyler


________________________________

	From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
	Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:41 PM
	To: Close, Tyler J.
	Cc: sduffy@aol.net; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
	Subject: Re: Editing process for Recommendations
	
	

	We're past May 18th. How are we doing? It seems we have three
proposals that have been put in template format. Will those be forming
the basis of our first public working draft recommendations? 
	
	          Mez
	
	Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l
333-6389)
	Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
	
	
	
	
"Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 

04/27/2007 06:40 PM

To
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org> 
cc
Subject
Editing process for Recommendations

	




	
	The calendar will soon turn to May and so if we're to do
anything other
	than drink Guinness while in Dublin for the next F2F, we will
need some
	draft recommendations.
	
	I think each draft recommendation should be written up by the
primary WG
	members who will be developing the proposal. This division of
labor
	ensures each proposal is described by those most knowledgeable
about it,
	and that we've got a champion for each proposal who will help
drive the
	testing and implementation work that must be done.
	
	To get some consistency among the proposal descriptions, I think
we
	should develop a template. The template would specify some
required
	sections for each proposal. For example, we could require a
section that
	enumerates the use-cases addressed by the proposal, or the
security
	information items relied upon, or the usability principles that
are
	leveraged, etc. We should develop this template over the course
of the
	next week.
	
	I'd need to get finished text for each of the proposals by May
18th. By
	finished text, I mean the exact text that should appear in the
	recommendation document, but not necessarily in the W3C XML
format. For
	those unfamiliar with this XML language, I could go through and
add the
	syntax for the sections, paragraphs and lists. Look at our Note
to see
	the available structural elements. Shawn and I could then merge
these
	proposals into a document by the 23rd so that we all have a week
to read
	and think about the proposals before meeting in Dublin.
	
	Tyler