Re: ISSUE-51: distinguished Chrome is not the answer (public comment)

The obvious question is what answer we send to the commenter here.
I'm not sure that's captured yet.  Or is it?

agenda+, mez?
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2007-05-21 18:24:44 -0000, Close, Tyler J. wrote:
> From: "Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:24:44 -0000
> Subject: RE: ISSUE-51: distinguished Chrome is not the answer (public comment) 
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Archived-At:
> 	http://www.w3.org/mid/08CA2245AFCF444DB3AC415E47CC40AFB52969@G3W0072.americas.h
> 	pqcorp.net
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
> There's a lot of text in the Description for this issue, but it appear
> Mez is just declaring consensus on an update to the description of
> "chrome" in the Note. I've applied this change and closed the issue.
> Please re-open if there is additional consensus to be captured.
>  
> Tyler
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
> 	Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:11 PM
> 	To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> 	Subject: Re: ISSUE-51: distinguished Chrome is not the answer
> (public comment) 
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	I declare concensus. The editors will make the change and close
> the issue. 
> 	
> 	
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Apr/0252.html
> 	
> 	          Mez
> 	
> 	Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l
> 333-6389)
> 	Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
> 	
> 	
>

Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 18:31:09 UTC