Re: Toward a last call for the Note

I agree with Mike
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>

Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:56:25 
To:<johnath@mozilla.com>, <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc:<tlr@w3.org>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Toward a last call for the Note


I think CABF and APWG are both good ideas.  Wells Fargo belongs to CABF (and sometimes participates in APWG); let me know if I can be of assistance.
 
A good way to liaise with the FBI (if the group wishes to do that) would be through Infraguard: http://www.infragard.net/ <http://www.infragard.net/> 
 
Also I'm sure Dan would agree that FSTC members will want to review the Note o.b.o. financial services industry.
 
----------------
 From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Johnathan Nightingale
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:25 AM
To: Mary Ellen Zurko
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Toward a last call for the Note



 
On 25-Jun-07, at 9:00 AM, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:


A suggestion we've made once or twice in the CABForum work, which may be equally appropriate here, would be to get someone from the law enforcement field (particularly anyone involved in issues of electronic crime, internet fraud issues) to give us, if not a formal review, at least a bird's eye view of whether these are the kind of things that they feel will lead to meaningful improvement or even, if we can dare to dream, suggest new features/restrictions they would like to see in place.  


I've read, for example, that the far and away leading online crime, in terms of number of incidents reported and damages (cite lacking, sorry...) is auction fraud.  Now, that is arguably outside or scope, but it does help cast a certain perspective on our work here, in terms of the areas where we can do the most good.  


This is a limp suggestion though, since I have no direct contacts with the people appropriate to offer this review.  It's possible that I/we could reach someone through APWG, but I'm a little reluctant to even mention that, since it sounds like volunteering, and I don't really have much active participation in the APWG at the moment.


In the meantime then, I welcome anyone else jumping in and saying they have a drinking buddy who is the head of the FBI's cybercrime unit.


Cheers,


J
 
---
Johnathan Nightingale
Human Shield
johnath@mozilla.com <mailto:johnath@mozilla.com>

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 17:49:03 UTC