W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > June 2007

RE: ACTION-210: "Security Protocol Error Presentation" display recommendation

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:23:55 -0400
To: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF63F18AA.387FEC51-ON852572F4.007503FA-852572F4.00758F4D@LocalDomain>
> 
> "Detailed test cases for expected user behavior could be developed 
> by identifying every combination of a protocol error and a use case. " 
> This seems like a bit much to me. But we should definately get a 
> list of errors. It would work best if this recommendation could 
> start the list. 
> [Mike:] Tyler's recommendation template requires test cases be tied 
> to our use cases, hence the dilemma. 

Point well taken. But it only says "should" (and in all low case to boot 
:-), so I think it's appropriate in this case not to tie them to use 
cases, except for the use cases already in this area. Like 11, maybe 12, 
13, 14, maybe 15, 17, maybe 18, maybe 20. 
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 21:24:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:48 GMT