- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 17:27:29 +0100
- To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 2007-06-06 17:17:31 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> In rewriting 2, I'll probably add a note that says that conformance >> claims for products need to elaborate on what "sufficiently >> trustworthy" is, and encourages referring to relevant >> specifications. That should certainly do for the first public >> working draft. > So I should not create a new issue on the basis that you'll include > it in whichever issue is causing you to re-draft section 2? Sounds plausible to me. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 16:27:34 UTC