W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Process point: I'm lazy

From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:38:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4664B06E.9020804@cs.tcd.ie>
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
CC: Rachna Dhamija <rachna.public@gmail.com>

Just wondering about this. In an otherwise excellent post
Rachna said:

 > If you disagree with anything here, please edit the wiki!

That seems to me to require me to disagree twice, and is a pattern
I think I've seen going by. Twice meaning: once editing the wiki
and once replying to the email with some context and a relevant

Notwithstanding the fact that I'm not shy about disagreeing, I
think once is often enough :-) If an email thread peters out,
then that's ok since there's no interest in the counterpoint;
if not, and the criticism sticks, then we all know that
someone should update the wiki, and the original author seems
like fair game then.

But, I've been disengaged for a bit now, and so maybe this has
been working just fine, though it seems like it could create a
masquerade of non-objection as concensus (if you know what I

Thought I'd ask anyway,
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 00:36:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:16 UTC