W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

SV: ISSUE-6: User Interface Issues for Mobile Browsing

From: Luis Barriga (KI/EAB) <luis.barriga@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:58:00 +0200
Message-ID: <1C6A13C92F510849B72272A71F9F3BCB0F8F0F@esealmw105.eemea.ericsson.se>
To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>

(Sorry for not following due to vacations)
My interpretation of "no prior interaction" was related to the client state not to the user's mental state. However, current use cases don't say explicitely whether the users (Alice, Betty ... ) are using the same client (e.g. at home) or a diffent one (e.g. at work). Thus, it seems that the implicit interpretation of "prior interaction" in current scenarios is "user's mental state".


Från: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org genom Thomas Roessler
Skickat: fr 2007-07-13 14:45
Till: Mary Ellen Zurko
Kopia: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Ämne: Re: ISSUE-6: User Interface Issues for Mobile Browsing

On 2007-07-13 08:40:18 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> I would very much like to extract from the thread what the set of
> changes are and declare doneness. However, it makes me nervous
> that no one answers questions about what "prior interaction" is
> supposed to mean in our use cases. See my question:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0067.html
> Thomas, since you set up that structure, perhaps you can respond
> to that question?

whooops, missed that.  In fact, "prior interaction" as it stands now
probably indeed confounds (a) client state and (b) user's mental
state.  Shouldn't be too difficult to fix that, though.

Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2007 19:00:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:17 UTC