W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ISSUE-93: Multi-platform compatibility

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:46:23 +0200
To: bruno@vonniman.com
Cc: Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070711124623.GP8439@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

Bruno, any reaction?

I'd propose to close this one without further change to the note.
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2007-07-06 20:59:11 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
> Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:59:11 +0200
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-93: Multi-platform compatibility
> X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/20070706185911.GG6561@raktajino.does-not-exist.org
> 
> 
> On 2007-07-02 11:53:42 +0000, Web Security Context Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
> > The specifications to be developed should rather be technology
> > platform- independent to the largest possible extent or at least
> > support multi-platform compatibility in a consistent way, to
> > allow for the transfer of consumer knowledge that be entirely
> > focused on a limited subset of technical protocols and platforms
> > currently used (e.g. for Web access from computers and mobile 
> > terminals). 
> 
> This strikes me as something that resonates deeply with the One Web
> paradigm [1] -- it's, in fact, so fundamental to W3C work that I
> *don't* think we need to be repeating it in the note or elsewhere.
> 
> 1. http://www.w3.org/Consortium/mission
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:46:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:49 GMT