W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ISSUE-78: Definitions

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:19:31 +0200
To: Bruno von Niman <ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com>
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070711121931.GF8439@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-07-05 14:28:46 +0200, Bruno von Niman wrote:

> I agree with adding the definitions, when getting on Rec track. 

> The most natural and efficient way to do it would be to ask all
> text contributors to check through their respective parts and
> propose what they believe should be defined, before we review and
> agree them,

Makes sense to me.  I think that, administratively, this discussion
translates into reassigning the issue to the recommendation.

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:19:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:49 GMT