W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ACTION-240 :TLS errors...

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:49:47 +0200
To: Dan Schutzer <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>
Cc: 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070709134947.GN6561@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

A new version of that one has come out today:

  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-04.txt
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-hartman-webauth-phishing/

(I haven't reviewed any of the changes so far, and I fear that I
dropped the ball on following up on your earlier note.  Since, so
far, you were the only one to have had comments on it, I'd encourage
you to send them as individual comments to ldusseault@commerce.net.)

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>








On 2007-07-09 09:42:40 -0400, Dan Schutzer wrote:
> From: Dan Schutzer <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>
> To: 'Thomas Roessler' <tlr@w3.org>
> Cc: 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:42:40 -0400
> Subject: RE: ACTION-240 :TLS errors...
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Message-ID: <026b01c7c22f$05bfdd20$6500a8c0@dschutzer>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
> This was the Trust Anchor, I was thinking of the other IETF draft you sent.
> What is its status of:
> 
> 
> Sam Hartman's Internet Draft "Requirements for Web Authentication Resistant
> to Phishing" [1] is currently in IETF Last Call; Lisa Dusseault (copied
> here) is the sponsoring Area Director
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 9:10 AM
> To: Dan Schutzer
> Cc: 'Stephen Farrell'; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ACTION-240 :TLS errors...
> 
> 
> On 2007-07-09 09:03:09 -0400, Dan Schutzer wrote:
> 
> > Does that mean there is no IETF work effort? Just as well, it was
> > duplicate of our work and had lots of things wrong with it.
> 
> It means that the -00 draft was replaced by the -01 draft:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wallace-ta-mgmt-problem-statement-
> 01.txt
> 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
> > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:43 AM
> > To: Stephen Farrell
> > Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: ACTION-240 :TLS errors...
> > 
> > 
> > On 2007-07-07 17:11:48 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> > 
> > > There's a problem statement [1] (note that a -01 has been posted,
> > > but has yet to show up) 
> > 
> > -00 has gone 404 by now.  Gotta love the IETF's policy of dropping
> > things.  In any event, is there an elevator speech-ish version of
> > this?  My printer is about to spit out a 16 page I-D...
> > 
> > >
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wallace-ta-mgmt-problem-statement-
> > 00.txt
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > -- 
> > Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 13:49:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:48 GMT