W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ACTION-240 :TLS errors...

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:09:46 +0200
To: Dan Schutzer <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>
Cc: 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070709130946.GL6561@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-07-09 09:03:09 -0400, Dan Schutzer wrote:

> Does that mean there is no IETF work effort? Just as well, it was
> duplicate of our work and had lots of things wrong with it.

It means that the -00 draft was replaced by the -01 draft:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wallace-ta-mgmt-problem-statement-01.txt

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:43 AM
> To: Stephen Farrell
> Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ACTION-240 :TLS errors...
> 
> 
> On 2007-07-07 17:11:48 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> > There's a problem statement [1] (note that a -01 has been posted,
> > but has yet to show up) 
> 
> -00 has gone 404 by now.  Gotta love the IETF's policy of dropping
> things.  In any event, is there an elevator speech-ish version of
> this?  My printer is about to spit out a 16 page I-D...
> 
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wallace-ta-mgmt-problem-statement-
> 00.txt
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 13:09:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:48 GMT