RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7

Tyler,
 
I'll look at it - also I have additional edits, how do you want to
handle this?
 
 

________________________________

	From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Close, Tyler J.
	Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:55 PM
	To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
	Subject: RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7
	
	
	Looking at the wiki history, it appears that I grabbed content
from this section after any of Bill's edits.
	 
	I rearranged this section a bit and renamed some items, so some
thinking may be required to match up all the items. If you think
there's something missing, please post about it to the mailing list.
	 
	I deliberately left off blacklists because we declared them out
of scope:
	 
	http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/Overview.html#filters
	 
	We had long conversations about this item during the telecons,
so I thought leaving it off was a settled issue. Please raise the issue
again on the mailing list if you want to re-open the filtering
discussion.
	 
	Tyler

________________________________

	From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
	Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:24 AM
	To: Doyle, Bill
	Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
	Subject: RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7
	
	

	Hi Bill,
	
	http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteSecurityContextAvailable
	It looks really good; excellent detail. 
	
	Glancing at 
	http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/Overview.html#Available
	
	It looks like Tyler picked it up before your most recent edits
(for example, there's nothing about blacklists in the Note). Please
work with him to update the section in the Note (Tyler, do you want to
do that yourself, or get Bill to send you something you can drop in?)
	
	          Mez
	
	Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l
333-6389)
	Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
	
	
	
	
"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> 

01/16/2007 11:11 AM

To
"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> 
cc
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 9	

		




	I have made a number of changes to section 9 security context
available.
	 
	Some items that I know I still need to review
	 
	 PKIX working group
	 HTTP
	 CA efforts
	 
	comments requested.
	 
	Thx
	Bill D.