W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Note Section - Design Principles

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:39:53 -0500
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF655E173F.821AE2F4-ON85257266.007C80B3-85257266.007C86D1@LocalDomain>
The most fun I've had all day:

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/UserDebugging


          Mez





Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> 
01/09/2007 11:23 AM

To
Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, "Maritza Johnson 
<maritzaj", W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc

Subject
Re: Note Section - Design Principles






(Tracking as ACTION-77.)

On 2007-01-08 15:35:40 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Maritza Johnson <maritzaj" <maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu>,
>                W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:35:40 +0100
> Subject: Re: Note Section - Design Principles
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> On 2007-01-08 09:30:44 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> 
> >> - Dialogues should not contain information which is irrelevant
> >> or rarely needed.
> 
> > I'm a fan of the button (or equivalent) that brings up more
> > information (for debugging, for explaining or reporting a
> > problem). I assume that falls within this recommendation (or the
> > next one), so I'd like to see it explicitly called out.
> 
> While we're on it, mind writing up a tiny "debugging" use case that
> motivates this point?
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 22:40:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:13 UTC