On 2007-02-13 17:58:16 -0600, michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com wrote: > I like the name Web Security Context! It states clearly & simply > exactly what we're about. And, just a matter of W3C procedure, > it's the name that's in our approved charter. Right, let's not even go near changing the name of the group at this point... What triggered this discussion was that "Web Security Context" is, however, a poor name for the Note that we're working on. I suggested "Web Security Context Use Cases and Requirements", but would be open for other proposals. Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 08:32:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:45 GMT