W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: What we're trying to protect...

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:23:22 +0100
To: Brad Porter <brad@tellme.com>
Cc: michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070213102322.GB30510@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-02-12 14:50:42 -0800, Brad Porter wrote:

> Are "confidentiality clues" something we need to add to our use 
> cases/requirements?  Would we consider it in-scope?

Use case 12 in the rework [1] tries to motivate working on
confidentiality cues.  I don't know, either, why these should be
considered out of scope.

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Feb/0026.html

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 10:21:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:45 GMT