FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations)

Another shot at two use cases. I will have another one to add by end of day

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:15 AM
To: Mary Ellen Zurko
Cc: Dan Schutzer
Subject: Re: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional
limitations)

Dan,

I notice that this use case hasn't made it on the mailing list, yet.
Can you please post it there?

Also, I still think we should stay away from child protection use
cases, meaning I'd strike the second of these use cases.  If we are
specifically after usability for children (where I think this
started from), then I think that should be said explicitly.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  +33-4-89063488






On 2007-08-10 09:43:18 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> Use Case 1: Mary attempts to access a site that has been identified by the

> browser as a phishing site. Mary is visually impaired how will the browser

> warn Mary about the site? What if Mary had other disabilities; e.g. poor 
> hearing, dexterity?
> 
>  
> 
> Use Case 2: Mary?s eight year old daughter has asked to use the home PC to

> access the Internet. Mary gives her daughter access to her computer. Mary 
> trusts her daughter, but is concerned that she might inadvertently be 
> directed to sites with inappropriate adult content and not be mature 
> enough to handle it. How can the browser warn Mary?s daughter when she 
> tries to access a web site with inappropriate content?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> From:Mary Ellen Zurko [mailto:Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:31 AM
> To: Dan Schutzer
> Cc: dan.schutzer@fstc.org; tlr@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and 
> functional limitations)
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Here's the mail message that the link below points to:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0256.html
> 
> >In summary, I don't think this use case should make it into the Note
> >as currently suggested; I'd rather see the filtering aspect removed
> >completely, and the overall focus readjusted to calling out users
> >with limited abilities.
> 
> I haven't seen anyone try to do this. Could one of you take a crack at a 
> redraft of this use case?
> 
>          Mez
> 
> Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
> Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [IMAGE]
> 
> 
> 
> RE: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and functional 
> limitations)
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Dan Schutzer 
> 
> 
> to:
> 
> 
> 'Mary Ellen Zurko', tlr
> 
> 
> 08/05/2007 08:51 PM
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Cc:
> 
> 
> dan.schutzer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What is your request? Sorry I don?t recall.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> From:Mary Ellen Zurko [mailto:Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com] 
> Sent:Friday, August 03, 2007 12:14 PM
> To:dan.schutzer@fstc.org; tlr@w3.org
> Subject:Re: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities and 
> functional limitations)
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Dan and Thomas, what if any are you intentions around my request to you?
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0319.html
> 
> 
>           Mez
>

Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 10:20:44 UTC