Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques]

Is that SHOULD for the case of UAs SHOULD display... in either primary or
secondary chrome, or SHOULD for the case of in primary chrome?

Personally, I vote for

MAY in primary chrome
and SHOULD in secondary chrome

and I'm trying to figure out if you're saying SHOULD for both, or just one?

On 8/10/07, michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com <
michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I vote for SHOULD.  Especially if we do take a strong stance against
> favicons, we need to offer marketers an alternative and more secure way
> of visually branding their sites.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:52 AM
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY?
> [Techniques]
>
>
> ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY?
> [Techniques]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/
>
> Raised by: Thomas Roessler
> On product: Techniques
>
> Should support for the display of logotypes be listed as a MAY or a
> SHOULD?
>
> a) in primary chrome?
> b) in secondary chrome?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>