RE: ISSUE-19: Arrangement and formatting of use cases

I've moved the use case as described. I haven't built a table. I'm not
sure what it should look like. Could someone try a mock-up in our wiki?
 
The use-cases are numbered instead of named because it didn't look
feasible to come up with a good name for each use case. If someone would
like to try, that would be wonderful.
 
Tyler


________________________________

	From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
	Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:27 AM
	To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
	Subject: Re: ISSUE-19: Arrangement and formatting of use cases
	
	

	With no discussion for more than a week, I will assume
concensus:
	
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Mar/0142.html
	
	Editors will move scenario 20 before scenario 16 (and we will
now regret numbering instead of naming them). 
	
	The table idea is editors' discretion; let us know if you do it
when you close the Issue. 
	
	          Mez
	
	Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l
333-6389)
	Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect