W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Question re: Comments USE-Cases

From: Robert Yonaitis <ryonaitis@hisoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:05:00 -0400
Message-ID: <AAD1044DDFFCC84895A899314A72FB6C952FC5@be04.exg3.exghost.com>
To: "Dan Schutzer" <dan.schutzer@fstc.org>, "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
   W3C Does as well in other groups I am involved with.  However I think I would agree in a note like this that any must or shoulds or mays could be problematic!


From: Dan Schutzer [mailto:dan.schutzer@fstc.org]
Sent: Wed 4/4/2007 9:45 AM
To: 'Thomas Roessler'; 'Mary Ellen Zurko'
Cc: Robert Yonaitis; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Question re: Comments USE-Cases

ANSI does

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:43 AM
To: Mary Ellen Zurko
Cc: ryonaitis@hisoftware.com; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Question re: Comments USE-Cases

On 2007-04-04 09:33:18 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> I know that the IETF (another standards type body) defines words
> like MUST and SHOULD in their documents. I don't know if W3C does
> along those lines, if anything.


Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

The information in this transmittal (including attachments, if any) is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above.  Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient.  If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  Thank you.
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 14:07:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:15 UTC