RE: Question re: Comments USE-Cases

   W3C Does as well in other groups I am involved with.  However I think I would agree in a note like this that any must or shoulds or mays could be problematic!
 
Thanks

________________________________

From: Dan Schutzer [mailto:dan.schutzer@fstc.org]
Sent: Wed 4/4/2007 9:45 AM
To: 'Thomas Roessler'; 'Mary Ellen Zurko'
Cc: Robert Yonaitis; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Question re: Comments USE-Cases



ANSI does

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:43 AM
To: Mary Ellen Zurko
Cc: ryonaitis@hisoftware.com; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Question re: Comments USE-Cases


On 2007-04-04 09:33:18 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> I know that the IETF (another standards type body) defines words
> like MUST and SHOULD in their documents. I don't know if W3C does
> along those lines, if anything.

http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#what-mandatory


Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>









The information in this transmittal (including attachments, if any) is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above.  Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient.  If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  Thank you.