Re: Note In Scope

Ok I just made that change to the wiki,
S.

Timothy Hahn wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm ok with the below except for the statemetn about "what reputation 
> services think about that source" part.
> 
> While I agree personally that this group has consider how such 
> information should factor in, I don't think it needs to be surfaced here.
> 
> Also,
> 
> s%organization to which that belongs%organization to which that 
> name/site/address belongs%
> 
> Regards,
> Tim Hahn
> 
> Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com
> Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
> phone: 919.224.1565     tie-line: 8/687.1565
> fax: 919.224.2530
> 
> 
> 
> *Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>*
> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
> 
> 12/19/06 07:13 AM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> cc
> 	"Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Subject
> 	Re: Note In Scope
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2006-12-19 12:11:38 +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
>  > It says: "A primary concern of this Working Group is the
>  > presentation of information identifying the host of a web
>  > resource."
>  >
>  > I'm not convinced that my mother would make much sense out of
>  > knowing that the WSC wiki is currently at 193.51.208.69, or even
>  > www.w3.org, so I'd like this abstracted a bit - user's really
>  > care more about the organisation with which they think they're
>  > interacting.
>  >
>  > So, I'd reword that to: "A primary concern of this Working Group
>  > is the presentation of information about the "source" of the web
>  > resources with which a user is interacting, e.g. the host DNS
>  > name or IP address, the name of the organisation to which that
>  > belongs, what reputation services think about that source, etc."
>  >
>  > I've not changed the wiki since I'm not really that happy with the
>  > suggested re-wording,
> 
> +1 to all of this.
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 14:56:58 UTC