On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 11:24 +0300, Marin Dimitrov wrote: > hi, > > I'm not sure what feature No:0 "plain WSDL document" means and we also > support feature No:14 "attrExtensions element with arbitrary annotations" The test files marked as feature 0 are plain WSDL documents with no SAWSDL annotation, just to check that the implementation also actually supports that case. As for attrExtensions - do you support really arbitrary extensions on attrExtensions? The reference file has <sawsdl:attrExtensions ex:foo="bar" wsdl2x:safe="true" sawsdl:modelReference="..."/> The idea here is that the API or tool can also make ex:foo and wsdl2x:safe available as extensions on the given operation. > we'll be working on feature No:16 "RDF Mapping", but we probably won't > have results before September If you do end up implementing the RDF mapping, please let me know and we can compare results with my implementation. I will have it within a few days of the Woden+SAWSDL API by Ajith et al., because I already have the WSDL RDF mapping over Woden. JacekReceived on Monday, 21 May 2007 22:26:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:12 GMT