W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/01/23

From: Tomas Vitvar <tomas.vitvar@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:48:10 -0000
To: "'Rama Akkiraju'" <akkiraju@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "'SAWSDL public list'" <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-ID: <03bc01c73f0e$4446c850$bf0110ac@ie.deri.local>

Hi Rama,
I think that such conditions should be described on operations rather then
types. Also by having such conditions on types some of constraints could be
directly described using XML schema so what would be the added value of
having such rules described separately?

Regards,
Tomas

--
http://www.vitvar.com 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-semann-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-semann-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rama Akkiraju
> Sent: 22 January 2007 16:22
> To: SAWSDL public list
> Subject: Re: Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/01/23
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> Brahmananda and I added a small example showing how to associate
> constraints to a WSDL via modelreference construct in section 3.7 in the
> editor's copy of the SAWSDL Usage guide
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/spec/examples/overview.html. Constraints
> are represented in SWRL (syntax is being verified). Please look it over
> and
> give feedback.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>              Jacek Kopecky
>              <jacek.kopecky@de
>              ri.org>                                                    To
>              Sent by:                  SAWSDL public list
>              public-ws-semann-         <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
>              request@w3.org                                             cc
> 
>                                                                    Subject
>              01/22/2007 11:05          Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/01/23
>              AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/01/23
> Zakim instructions [2]
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2007Jan/0006
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>  - Scribe list: (inactive)  JBD, JL, MK, JH, NG, TP,
>                 (active)    TV, PM, SD, JF, CP, CV, HL,
>                             LH, LF, RA, BNS, AS, EP, CB,
>  - Any modifications to agenda?
>  - Any other business?
> of minutes of our last telcon
>  - Minutes of last call [1]
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070116
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>  - Action item list [1]
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions
> 
> 2006-11-21: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work
>             things out with the Usage Guide
>  - pending?
> 
> 2007-01-16: JohnM to start putting together a test suite - set of WSDL
> files
>             showing the spec features
>  - pending?
> administrivia
>  - Transition to CR in progress
>  - We may want a shorter namespace name, two options
>    - http://www.w3.org/2007/01/sawsdl
>    - http://www.w3.org/ns/sawsdl  - requires director approval
>    - WSDL uses the first form
>  - The group can start thinking ahead of a draft
>    press release for Recommendation
>  - Policy responded to our comments at [1], seems fine
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Jan/0009
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>  - Test suite (annotated WSDL documents for the features)
>    - Waiting on action item
>  - We should devise interop tests for parsers/generators, others?
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> operation inputs and outputs
>  - Raised by Ajith [1]
>  - 5.2 talks about input and output, meaning XML Schema and
>    WSDL 1.1 message parts
>  - Does Ajith mean wsdl/interface/operation/input|output ?
>    - If so, do we want to describe annotating them?
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann-comments/2007Jan/0010
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> comments
>  - Sent Dec 18 by Mary Holstege at [1]
>  - We should make some reference to XML Schema component model
>  - We should clarify why schema mappings only on global elements
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann-comments/2006Dec/0000
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> WS-Policy as part of the semantic model [1]
>  - waiting for response from Karthik on examples
>  - waiting for other inputs regarding any other policy-related issues
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x32
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> associating Preconditions and Effects with Web
>               Services [1]
>  - waiting for concrete text in the usage guide
>  - then we can see if we want it there
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x33
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:51:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:14:27 GMT