W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > February 2007

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/02/27

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:26:56 +0100
To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1172503616.32351.16.camel@localhost>

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/02/27
Dial-in information (member-only) [1]
Zakim instructions [2]

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2007Feb/0013
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim


----------------------------------------
1. Call setup
 - Scribe list: (active)    SD, HL, LH, LF, RA, BNS, AS, 
                            EP, CB, TV, CP, JF, PM, CV, 
                (inactive)  JBD, JL, MK, JH, NG, TP
 - Any modifications to agenda?
 - Any other business?


----------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes of our last telcon
 - Minutes of last call [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070220


----------------------------------------
3. Action Item Review
 - Action item list [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions

2006-11-21: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work
            things out with the Usage Guide
 - pending?


----------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
 - Telcon times - US changes time to DST two weeks before Europe
   - Mar 13 and Mar 20 telcons will be one hour later in the US
 - Any tutorials, articles, presentations, tools, projects, 
   applications, demos, portals for our WG page?
 - Expecting TAG's response to question about 
   moving WSDL operation safety to SAWSDL [1]


----------------------------------------
5. Namespace change to /ns/sawsdl ? [1]
 - Following suit with WSDL 2.0

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Feb/0022


----------------------------------------
6. Implementation status
 - Implementation report [1]
 - Test suite [2]
 - Status of your implementations?
   - Two WSDL 2.0 parsers
   - One WSDL 1.1 parser (with attrExtensions support)
   - RDF mapping (expected from Jacek by end of Feb)
   - Specs using SAWSDL (at least 1 expected from DERI by end of Feb)

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/Overview.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite.html


----------------------------------------
7. CR Issue 6: propagation of annotations [1]
 - Should the model reference and schema mapping propagation
   in our spec be reflected in the WSDL/XML Schema component models?
 - Is our interface extension model reference propagation broken? [2] 
   - Counterexample - safe interface (only safe operations), when extended,
     need not stay safe
 - Summary of previous discussion:
   - WSDL doesn't say whether interface extension is inheritance or
     aggregation, both can be justified
   - Would it be useful for us to specify a restriction on this?
   - Some model references should propagate, others shouldn't
   - We probably don't want new syntax, but we can instruct (SA)WSDL authors
     to consider propagation of some model references manually

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/CR-20070126#x6
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Feb/0018.html


----------------------------------------
8. Future of the Working Group
 - After we get to Proposed Rec, we can suggest to do further work
 - We'd need to formulate new charter, to be approved by the AC
 - Or we can suggest new WG(s), declare success and dissolve
Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 15:27:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:14:27 GMT