- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:26:56 +0100
- To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/02/27
Dial-in information (member-only) [1]
Zakim instructions [2]
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2007Feb/0013
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
----------------------------------------
1. Call setup
- Scribe list: (active) SD, HL, LH, LF, RA, BNS, AS,
EP, CB, TV, CP, JF, PM, CV,
(inactive) JBD, JL, MK, JH, NG, TP
- Any modifications to agenda?
- Any other business?
----------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes of our last telcon
- Minutes of last call [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070220
----------------------------------------
3. Action Item Review
- Action item list [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions
2006-11-21: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work
things out with the Usage Guide
- pending?
----------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
- Telcon times - US changes time to DST two weeks before Europe
- Mar 13 and Mar 20 telcons will be one hour later in the US
- Any tutorials, articles, presentations, tools, projects,
applications, demos, portals for our WG page?
- Expecting TAG's response to question about
moving WSDL operation safety to SAWSDL [1]
----------------------------------------
5. Namespace change to /ns/sawsdl ? [1]
- Following suit with WSDL 2.0
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Feb/0022
----------------------------------------
6. Implementation status
- Implementation report [1]
- Test suite [2]
- Status of your implementations?
- Two WSDL 2.0 parsers
- One WSDL 1.1 parser (with attrExtensions support)
- RDF mapping (expected from Jacek by end of Feb)
- Specs using SAWSDL (at least 1 expected from DERI by end of Feb)
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/Overview.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite.html
----------------------------------------
7. CR Issue 6: propagation of annotations [1]
- Should the model reference and schema mapping propagation
in our spec be reflected in the WSDL/XML Schema component models?
- Is our interface extension model reference propagation broken? [2]
- Counterexample - safe interface (only safe operations), when extended,
need not stay safe
- Summary of previous discussion:
- WSDL doesn't say whether interface extension is inheritance or
aggregation, both can be justified
- Would it be useful for us to specify a restriction on this?
- Some model references should propagate, others shouldn't
- We probably don't want new syntax, but we can instruct (SA)WSDL authors
to consider propagation of some model references manually
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/CR-20070126#x6
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Feb/0018.html
----------------------------------------
8. Future of the Working Group
- After we get to Proposed Rec, we can suggest to do further work
- We'd need to formulate new charter, to be approved by the AC
- Or we can suggest new WG(s), declare success and dissolve
Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 15:27:06 UTC