Re: change of SAWSDL namespace?

The reasoning is that new versions of WSDL can mostly be done with
extensions, or that they can have http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl3 etc.
Anyway, the feeling in the WSDL group is that no new version is coming
soon anyway.
Best regards,
Jacek

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:54 +0100, Marin Dimitrov wrote:
> Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > the WSDL WG just decided today to change the WSDL namespace from
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl to http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl
> > 
> > We have previously discussed the shorter form as well, and we decided to
> > stay with a dated namespace, because WSDL had it. Now it doesn't -
> > should we change our namespace to match WSDL's form, or should we keep
> > it as it is?
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > 
> 
> but this way don't they lose the versioning ability? How many different 
> specification versions can they map into the "http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl" 
> namespace?
> 
> best,
> 
> 	Marin
> 
> ----
> "...what you brought from your past, is of no use in your present. When
> you must choose a new path, do not bring old experiences with you.
> Those who strike out afresh, but who attempt to retain a little of the
> old life, end up torn apart by their own memories. "
>