no plans to ask for i18n review of LC doc from Eric Prud'hommeaux on 2006-09-26 (public-ws-semann@w3.org from September 2006)

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:25:57 +0200
To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20060926132557.GA14340@w3.org>

Per the attached feedback from Felix, who would probably be the one to
due an i18n review of SAWSDL, I don't plan to ask for i18n review of
the SAWSDL Last Call document.
-- 
-eric

home-office: +1.617.395.1213 (usually 900-2300 CET)
	    +33.1.45.35.62.14
cell:       +33.6.73.84.87.26

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Forwarded message 1

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:19:49 +0900
Subject: SWASDL and i18n attributes
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4518C685.5050204@w3.org>

Hi Eric,

Sorry for the late reply.

I had a look at
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/spec/SAWSDL#RunningExample , and I
don't think you need any i18n attributes here (except xml:lang, which
you have for free). Not more than in any WSDL file :)

Please feel free to forward this mail to any list, if useful.

Felix

Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 13:24:48 UTC