Re: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL]

Dear Pierre, 

the SAWSDL spec is independent of any taxonomies, but the ones you
mention could be pointed to as examples. I opened new issue 20 [1] to
consider that.

If you decide to use SAWSDL (or WSDL-S) in your work, you can already
use these taxonomies, most probably you'd put those tModel URIs as
taxonomyURI on interface category.

Hope it helps,

Jacek

On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 23:53 +0200, Pierre Châtel wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> me again. Since I'm continuing my work on mapping sawsdl into UDDI, I  
> noticed that you did not specified any normalized URIs for  
> referencing NAICS, UNSPNC or GICS taxonomies.
> Wouldn't it be great to use the ones that are specified in http:// 
> uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm ?
> Like http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#NAICS  
> for NAICS
> or http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#UNSPSC  
> for UNSPNC ?
> 
> This way i would be able to map the categorization information  
> provided by a SAWSDL service definition by directly using the  
> standard UDDI taxonomy tModels (just by matching URIs when mapping to  
> UDDI) !
> 
> Pierre
>