W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > April 2006

RE: Scenarios for embedded annotations in WS description

From: Shi, Xuan <xshi@GEO.WVU.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:54:12 -0400
Message-ID: <D81F456794C18B4DA3E2ABC47DBBEEF2095037@www.geo.wvu.edu>
To: "'public-ws-semann@w3.org'" <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Cc: "'Carine Bournez '" <carine@w3.org>, "'hugo@w3.org'" <hugo@w3.org>

Carine,

Below are four WSDL urls for your kind attention. All of them have the same
function for address geocoding service. I'd be happy to see how you guys add
semantic annotations to such different WSDLs to tell people-they are all the
same service and function:

http://www.arcwebservices.com/services/v2006/AddressFinder.wsdl

http://arcweb.esri.com/services/v2/AddressFinder.wsdl

http://rpc.geocoder.us/dist/eg/clients/GeoCoder.wsdl

http://157.182.136.76/xshi/disst/geocodingservice/geocodingconversion.asmx?W
SDL

Remember the first two have embedded Web services, which means the geocoding
service in these two WSDL depends on the result of other services that have
different input varialbes. So semantic annotation should tell people that
they have to invoke two Web services in order.

The remaining questions is how people can dynamically invoke such service
functions by reading the WSDL with *semantic annotations*?

Hope such use cases in living Web services may be helpful to your IGers
whether you like them or not.

Thanks for your kind attention.

Xuan

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Carine Bournez
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Sent: 4/24/06 3:36 AM
Subject: Scenarios for embedded annotations in WS description



Hello IGers,

The Semantic Annotations for WSDL Working Group is considering
various scenarios where annotations are added to WSDL descriptions.
The Interest Group has not deeply discussed this in the past, but
if individuals have ideas or real use cases for *embedded semantic 
annotations* please send them to public-ws-semann#w3.org. Thank you!

On behalf of the SA WG,

-- 
Carine Bournez -+ W3C Europe
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 13:56:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:14:26 GMT