W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann-comments@w3.org > March 2009

Re: extending SAWSDL for XML instance semantic models

From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:49:58 -0400
To: Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>
Cc: "public-ws-semann-comments@w3.org" <public-ws-semann-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090314104958.GK9802@homer.w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:03:00AM -0400, Ken Laskey wrote:
> 
> <lifecycleStatus>conceptual</lifecycleStatus>
> 
> but I don't have an immediate way to tell someone what the semantic  
> model is that describes "conceptual".  I can't add conceptual as an  
> enumeration value in the lifecycle semantic model because not everyone  
> will have a "conceptual" as a prescribed value and there will be lots  
> of other values defined over time.  I certainly don't want to revise  
> the lifecycle semantic model every time there is a new status  
> proposed.  That is where we are now and it is neither scalable nor  
> maintainable.


> What I would like to have is a semantic model of each set of lifecycle  
> values and then be able to create a mapping between them, and my guess  
> is the lifecycleStatus semantic model would help me create the mapping.

Hi Ken,
What about 
<lifecycleStatus>http://my.example.org/ontologies/foo/bar#conceptual</lifecycleStatus> ?
Received on Saturday, 14 March 2009 10:56:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 14 March 2009 10:56:20 GMT