RE: bug 11899

Removing the text in question seems fine.

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:13 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: Re: bug 11899


What do other's think?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com<mailto:dug@us.ibm.com>
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com<mailto:gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>>

02/04/2011 02:48 PM

To

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

public-ws-resource-access@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>

Subject

Re: bug 11899







I'm OK with this.

It's amusing that we go to so much trouble to describe the [Code] property when, in all of WS-RA, we only define two s12:Receiver faults; both in WS-Enum.

~ gp

On 2/1/2011 3:53 PM, Doug Davis wrote:

All
 please review the bug 11899 ( http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11899 ) - Li has found some interesting info and I think we're better off if we just remove the entire text in question.    If people are ok with this perhaps we can re-resolve it thru email.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com<mailto:dug@us.ibm.com>
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
----- Forwarded by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM on 02/01/2011 06:52 PM -----
bugzilla@jessica.w3.org<mailto:bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org>

02/01/2011 06:50 PM


To

public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org>

cc

Subject

[Bug 11899] All: fault section table is missing both soap versions








http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11899

--- Comment #4 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com><mailto:dug@us.ibm.com> 2011-02-01 23:50:45 UTC ---
Actually, I'd prefer to just remove those lines of text from the spec.
Meaning remove:
- - - -
For SOAP 1.2, the [Code] property MUST be either "Sender" or "Receiver". These
properties are serialized into text XML as follows:
<table>
SOAP Version     Sender             Receiver
SOAP 1.2     s12:Sender     s12:Receiver
</table>
- - - - -

We don't need the mapping table since each Code property already
has either s12:Sender or s12:Receiver - this makes the table
pointless.

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.