W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > May 2010

Re: comments about proposal for Issue 9610

From: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 08:01:57 -0700
Message-ID: <4BEAC2E5.5020404@oracle.com>
To: "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>
CC: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Li,

The message has no parts because I want to generate a SOAP message with 
an empty Body. If I defined a part, wouldn't it be used as the SOAP Body?

- gp

On 5/12/2010 7:50 AM, Li, Li (Li) wrote:
> Gil,
> Some comments about proposal [1] for issue 9610.
>
> 1) there is a small typo in Appendix B.2 WSDL:
>      mlns:tns="http:// www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/ws-evt
>
> 2) Appendix B.2 WSDL has a message with zero part. Although this is
> legal, it can cause problems for toolkits. Also there is no Infoset for
> this message. How about define a part/element and say the psudo event is
> never filtered.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=877&action=edit
>
> Thanks,
>
> Li
>
>    



Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 15:03:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:56 UTC