W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > January 2010

RE: AI 129 - concrete proposal for issue 8292 (fwd)

From: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:27:50 +0000
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <503546C5699C1144BDEA0D0DFFE7F881184BE27B@TK5EX14MBXC119.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
The proposal in section 4 Metadata Resources removes the sentence "A Web service endpoint MAY have one or more associated metadata resources". I suggest retaining it since it is not repeated anywhere else in the specification.

Otherwise, the proposal looks good.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Lafon [mailto:ylafon@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 6:54 AM
To: Ram Jeyaraman
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: RE: AI 129 - concrete proposal for issue 8292 (fwd)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Ram Jeyaraman wrote:

> Hi Yves,
>
> For some reason, I am not able to read the HTML file attachment you 
> had provided.

It should be a gzipped version of the file, See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Dec/att-0075/wsmex-8292.html.gz

(curiously, the attachment with a 'text/html' has nothing to do with this, on the page, it was forwarded by my MUA, so part of the original message, but it's clearly not the right name :) ).

> I am curious if this is just a problem on my side?
>
> What is the encoding that is used for the HTML doc?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves 
> Lafon
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:39 AM
> To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
> Subject: Re: AI 129 - concrete proposal for issue 8292 (fwd)
>
> (with a compressed file)
>
> --
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>
>         ~~Yves
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:17:09 +0000
> From: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
> To: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" 
> <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
> Subject: [Moderator Action (size limit exceeded)] Re: AI 129 - concrete proposal
>      for issue 8292
>
>
> --------------010008060106050509020906
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Attached is a marked up version of WS-MEX that compromises a concrete proposal for issue 8292.
>
> - gp
>
> --------------010008060106050509020906
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> 
> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font 
> face="Calibri">Attached is a marked up version of WS-MEX that 
> compromises a concrete proposal for issue 8292.<br> <br>
> - gp<br>
> </font>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> --------------010008060106050509020906--
>

--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves


Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 20:28:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:22 GMT