W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > January 2010

Agenda 2010-01-19

From: Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:39:28 -0500
Message-Id: <7D02691E-89FE-438E-833D-EB4CACFC4C57@hitachisoftware.com>
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
distributed meeting:

Dial-in and IRC according to usual practice[5]

Topic: Opening
Roll
Assignment of scribe[1]
Approval of this Agenda
Approval of minutes 2009-12-15[2] 
Approval of minutes 2010-01-05[6] 
Approval of minutes 2010-01-12[7] 

Topic: Action Items[4]

N.B. Key:
a number preceding the issue indicates a suggested order of discussion
Items marked "X" in the chair's opinion need seasoning or at least a proposal
A and B are secret code markings LOL
E seem to the chair to be editorial
L in the opinion of the chair might be left for last call

Topic: New Issue Moratorium
The working group decided on 2009-11-05 to impose a new issue moratorium effective end of business on 2009-11-13

Topic: Issues with proposals

MEX:
X-Issue-6463 MEX-Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6463 -Warr
X-Issue-7728 MEX: Attaching Policy to Indicate MEX/MEX Features Supported http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7728 -Malhotra
X-Issue-8031 WS-Mex: Distinguishing the 'main' metadata http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8031-Warr (7986)
BX-Issue-8205 MEX: can mex appear more than once in an EPR http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8205 -Davis
X-Issue-8289 MEX: misuse of RFC2119 terms http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8289 -Pilz
L-Issue-8290 MEX: "Requirements" section confusing and unnecessary http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8290 -Pilz
E-Issue-8292 MEX: redundant discussions of WS-T/GetMetadata duality http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8292 -Pilz
-Issue-8294 MEX: editorial: description of @Identifier too verbose http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8294 -Pilz

Transfer:

Eventing:
X-Issue-6435 Eventing needs state table to fully describe protocol http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6435 -Pilz (LC)
X-Issue-7986 Eventing: supported notification policy http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7986 -Davis (8031)
1B-Issue-8068 Eventing: Create ED Doc http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8068 -Davis
  proposal at 
2-Issue-8180 Transfer: can a resource represenation be empty? http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8180 -Davis
16X-Issue-8198 Eventing:  A mechanism to relate the portType(s) of an event source Web Service to the abstract description of the events it can produce http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8198-Nixon
17-Issue-8271 Eventing: misuse of RFC2119 terms http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8271 -Pilz
18A-Issue-8275 Eventing: editorial: description of wse:Filter/@Dialect verbose and unclear http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8275 -Pilz
3B-Issue-8283 Eventing: fault descriptions/semantics are inconsistent http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283 -Pilz
4-Issue-8286 Eventing: description of Subscription End ambiguous http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8286 -Pilz
19-Issue-8288 Eventing: requirements on Notification Bindings for EventDescriptions too lax http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8288 -Pilz
20-Issue-8298 Transfer: misuse of RFC2119 terms http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8298 -Pilz
21X-Issue-8299 Transfer: possible ambiguity of extensions in PutResponse and CreateResponse http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8299 -Pilz
5-Issue-8301 Transfer: generating the PutDenied fault http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8301 -Pilz
22E-Issue-8302 Transfer: descriptions of PutResponse and CreateResponse contain unclear sections http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8302 -Pilz

Common:
23X-Issue-7791 Consistent Policy applied to a set of resources http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7791 -Fremantle
24Issue-8160 All: RFC2119 - "required" keyword  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8160 -Davis
25XL-Issue-8273 : All: "Security Considerations" sections vague and misleading http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8273 -Pilz
26X-Issue-8284 All: references to WSDL 1.1 should be to BP-corrected version http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8284 -Pilz

Enumeration:
27X-Issue-6436 WS-Enumeration needs state table to fully describe protocol http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6436 -Pilz (LC)
28B-Issue-8157 Enum: apply 6595 to enum http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8157 -Davis
29-Issue-8304 Enum: misuse of RFC2119 terms http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8304 -Pilz
30E-Issue-8306 Enum: description of Pull contains unclear sections http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8306 -Pilz

Frag:
7-Issue-7774 @mode in ws-frag is harmful http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7774 -Lafon
9-Issue-8181 Frag: description of fragment put is confusing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8181 -Pilz
10-Issue-8182 Frag: unclear if/when result of a fragment Put is XSD validated http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8182 -Pilz
11-Issue-8191 serialization of fragment Put input is underspecified http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8191 -Pilz
8-Issue-8196 Frag: inheriting enveloping namespace prefixes is dangerous http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8196 -Pilz
12-Issue-8229 Frag: XPath Level 1's treatment of unqualified element names is dangerous http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8229 -Pilz
13L-Issue-8185 Frag: fragment Put @Mode="Insert" underspecified http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8185 -Pilz
6-Issue-8193 Fragment: Replace mode could be clearer http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8193 -Davis
14L-Issue-8257 Frag:AttributeNode/@name description unclear http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8257 -Pilz
15L-Issue-8258 Frag: limits to expression languages and the Put operation http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8258 -Pilz
===


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/chair-tools/scribelist.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/12/2009-12-15.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/wiki/Main_Page
[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/tracker/actions/open
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/admin.html
[6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/01/2010-01-05.html
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/01/2010-01-12.html
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 19:40:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:22 GMT