Re: [Bug 8281] New: wse:RetryAfter extension semantics

+1

On 1/2/2010 12:33 PM, Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
> Since the section "3.2 Considerations on the use of extensibility points" describes that extensions MUST NOT contradict the base semantics, I suggest removing the paragraph [1]. This is consistent with how other extension points are treated/described in the specification.
>
> [1] WS-Eventing paragraph to be removed
>
> "/wse:RetryAfter/@any
>
>     OPTIONAL extensibility attributes that do not affect processing."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:34 AM
> To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
> Subject: [Bug 8281] New: wse:RetryAfter extension semantics
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8281
>
>            Summary: wse:RetryAfter extension semantics
>            Product: WS-Resource Access
>            Version: PR
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: Eventing
>         AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
>         ReportedBy: gilbert.pilz@oracle.com
>          QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
>
>
> The semantics of the possible extension elements to wse:RetryAfter are under-specified. The current text says:
>
> "/wse:RetryAfter/@any
>
>     OPTIONAL extensibility attributes that do not affect processing."
>
> Proposal:
>
> "OPTIONAL extensibility attributes that MUST NOT affect processing."
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
> You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
>
>