W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Interop scenarios readiness

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:37:00 -0500
To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFA3ACDAC2.7F4ACECE-ON852577EE.0070B9AC-852577EE.007141A6@us.ibm.com>
  one of the things we talked about during the last call (which you were 
unable to attend) was the idea of creating one big scenario rather than 
many smaller ones.  Clearly it would need to have support for each spec 
defined as optional so that people could only support the ones they 
wanted,but for those that support more than one having a consolidated 
scenario will not only make their lives easier but it might also expose 
some potential composition bugs that we might otherwise miss.  Asir asked 
for some time to think about this - any news from your side?

STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
12/03/2010 01:32 PM

"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>

Interop scenarios readiness

I suggest that we discuss and determine when we expect all the 
interoperation scenarios will be ready so that test implementation work 
can proceed. When interoperation scenarios will mature and be ready for 
test implementations to use is a critical factor in determining when we 
can do the testing/F2F. In order for us to do testing in mid-February as 
agreed, based on my estimate, we should have the interoperation scenarios 
ready no later than Dec  21st.
Does getting interoperation scenarios mature by Dec 21st seem a realistic 
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 20:37:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:57 UTC