W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Agenda, WS-RA 2010-04-20

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:36:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1004201535560.30732@wnl.j3.bet>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Bob Freund wrote:

Regrets.

> Distributed Meeting
>
> Dial-in and IRC according to usual practice[5]
>
> Topic: Opening
> Roll
> Assignment of scribe[1]
> Approval of this Agenda
> Approval of minutes of 2010-03-30[2]
> Approval of minutes of 2010-04-06[6]
>
>
> Topic: LCWD Comments
> -none yet
>
> Topic: Face to face schedule
> Redmond/Bellevue 2010-05-11 through 2010-05-13 confirmed logistics at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Apr/0004.html
> Sophia 2010-06-15 through 2010-06-17 location and dates tentative
>
> N.B. Key:
> a number preceding the issue indicates a suggested order of discussion
> Items marked "X" in the chair's opinion need seasoning or at least a proposal
> L have been reviewd and determined that they MAY be resolved after last call, or have arrived after the last call issue moratorium
> P are waiting proposals
>
> Topic: New Issues
> 1-Issue-9543 Enum/Eventing: which version of soap should be used for EndTo, NotifyTo...  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9543 -Davis
> -Issue-9558 Separate xpath dialect from WS-Frag spec http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 -Hirsch
>
> Topic: Issues
>
> MEX:
>
> Transfer:
> P-Issue-9087 Transfer: What is a "resource"  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9087 -Freund
> 2-Issue-9250 MEX: No easy way to determine soap version w/o WSDL http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9250 -Davis
>
> Eventing:
>
> EVD:
> 3-Issue-9321 EVD: Should qname be optional? http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9321 -Davis
>
> Common:
> 4-Issue-8273 : All: "Security Considerations" sections vague and misleading http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8273 -Pilz
> f2f-Issue-8284 All: references to WSDL 1.1 should be to BP-corrected version http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8284 -Pilz (BP 1.2 and 2.0 status)
>
> Enumeration:
>
> Frag:
> -none-
>
> 2119:
> -none-
>
>
> f2f-Definition of independent implementations
> f2f-Implementation matrix, start of features at risk determination
> ===
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/chair-tools/scribelist.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/03/2010-03-30.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/wiki/Main_Page
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/tracker/actions/open
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/admin.html
> [6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/04/2010-04-06.html

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:36:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:26 GMT