W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > September 2009

RE: Re: Issue 7554: Eventing - Unsubscribe Fault Message (action item 103)

From: Li, Li (Li) <lli5@avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:03:23 -0400
Message-ID: <7DC6C0F0E8D7C74FB4E1E73CC371280A012670B5@300813ANEX2.global.avaya.com>
To: <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Cc: "Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com>

I have a minor problem with using EventSourceUnableToProcess as the
catch-all fault for the getstatus/renew/unsubscribe messages, as in your
proposal [1]:

Please note:  Li li added a comment to this issue here 
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7554#c1 suggesting that we

should have an UnableToXXX fault for each of Subscribe, Renew,
Unsubscribe.  Currently, Subscribe uses EventSourceUnableToProcess for 
this purpose; Renew uses UnableToRenew; Unsubscribe and GetStatus don't 
have an equivalent fault.  This proposal suggests that they all share
EventSourceUnableToProcess fault to indicate a general failure to
the request.

I think EventSourceUnableToProcess is ok for the subscribe message as it
is sent to the Event Source. But using it for other messages seems
inconsistent with our architecture that these other messages are sent to
the Subscription Manager, not the Event Source. Would a
SubscriptionManagerUnableToProcess be more appropriate? 



Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 22:04:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:52 UTC