W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Issue 7426 (URI vs IRI) (was Action 97)

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:16:25 -0400
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF7919D64D.B2CF0AE4-ON8525762B.0053D128-8525762B.0053EA58@us.ibm.com>
What does this mean for the use of the xs:anyURI schema type?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
09/08/2009 10:20 AM

To
public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
cc

Subject
Issue 7426 (URI vs IRI) (was Action 97)






Hi,
After reading the status or URI/IR support in the specification linked to 
ours, it turns out that they all support IRIs apart from WSDL 1.0 which is 

seilent on the subject.
So we should do the following:

In all our spec, replace URI by IRI, and any reference to RFC3986 to 
RFC3987.
Cheers,

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 15:17:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:13 GMT