W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > May 2009

Re: resolution of 6429

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:47:32 -0400
To: "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, "Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com>
Message-ID: <OFAC73FB2D.51C57924-ON852575C2.00513BA1-852575C2.0051449A@us.ibm.com>
Let's discuss this on today's call.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



"Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
05/26/2009 10:37 AM

To
<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com>
Subject
Re: resolution of 6429






Doug,

Sorry I didn't catch your emails earlier. I have some concerns on
putting the wrapped port type in the ws-eventing.wsdl which is for the
event source whereas the wrapped port type is for the sink. In the 6401
proposal, we created separated wsdls (source wsdl and notification wsdl)
so current tools can work on them directly. 

Thanks,

Li Li
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 14:48:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:00 GMT