W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Issue 6595: proposal 1

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:24:16 -0400
To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA3FA3367.5EEE3A1B-ON85257576.000D172D-85257576.000D3617@us.ibm.com>
One minor nit... just to be clear that this fault is generated during a 
subscribe and not later....add  "in response to a Subscribe request 
message" to the end of the new text. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com



Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
03/10/2009 09:43 PM

To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc

Subject
Issue 6595: proposal 1






Add the following text to the exposition on 
/s:Envelope/s:Body/*/wse:Filter after the second paragraph:

It is possible for the request to contain a filter that will not evaluate 
to true for the lifetime of the Subscription. Although this condition 
cannot be detected for all dialects, implementers are advised to check for 
it when possible and OPTIONALLY generate a wse:EmptyFilter fault.

Add the following fault definition to Section 6:

6.8 EmptyFilter

This fault MAY be generated when an Event Source detects a wse:Subscribe 
request containing a filter that, for whatever reason, will never evaluate 
to true.

[Code]
s12:Sender
[Subcode]
wse:EmptyFilter
[Reason]
The wse:Filter would result in zero Notifications
[Detail]
The wse:Filter value.
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 02:24:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:17:51 GMT