W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > July 2009

6413+6975+7014 was:Issues 6713 and 6975: Proposal for resolution

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:11:21 -0600
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF57C163F0.69AD1C75-ON852575EC.00637B8E-852575EC.0063ED2D@us.ibm.com>
Attached is a slightly modified version of the proposal.  There were some 
last minute editorial tweaks requested (done as user "Dug2").  Also, its 
worth noting that we believe this should resolve issue 7014 as well 6413 
and 6975.  On issue 6413, if we adopt this proposal there are still other 
aspects that we'll need to work out - like the exact content of the 
ws-frag spec.  But we could open a new issue to cover that.



thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> 
07/04/2009 11:01 PM

To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Subject
Issues 6713 and 6975: Proposal for resolution






During one of the recent WG meetings, it was suggested that using a 
framework approach might be a possible way to resolve issue 6713. That is, 
define a framework in WS-Transfer to optionally support advanced transfer 
mechanisms. Please find attached a joint proposal from IBM, Microsoft, and 
Oracle that presents a possible resolution to issue 6713. This proposal 
also includes a proposed resolution for 6975.[attachment "6975 6413 
proposal 06-01c.doc" deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM] 


Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 18:12:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:08 GMT