Re: [NEW ISSUE] WS-Eventing Notifications violates WS-I BP

Hi Antoine,
  we may need to bring in people who are more BP experts (and have the 
history of this issue) but I'm sure everyone knows the semantics of 
Notifications in general so I don't think that was the issue for the BP 
folks.  I think it was more related to the notion that WSDL typically 
describes what a client is expected to do to talk to the service so to 
then have WSDL be used in the reverse direction seems to be counter to 
that idea.  There are probably several options for fixing these types of 
issues but in the end I'd like to be able to use my BP-compliant tooling 
on the WSDLs produced by this WG and with these output-only operations 
it'll generate errors.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com



Antoine Mensch <antoine.mensch@odonata.fr> 
01/09/2009 07:27 AM
Please respond to
antoine.mensch@odonata.fr


To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject
Re: [NEW ISSUE] WS-Eventing Notifications violates WS-I BP






Doug,

don't you think that because WS-Eventing actually defines a clear 
semantics for Notification and Solicit-Response operations, the 
rationale for prohibiting them in BP1.1 somewhat disappears?

Cheers

Antoine