W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > August 2009

RE: 6411: proposal

From: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:56:42 +0000
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <503546C5699C1144BDEA0D0DFFE7F881097E9367@TK5EX14MBXC110.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Hi Doug,

Isn't it sufficient to just have the getMetadatafactory operation (section 6.2 in the proposal) that exposes a separate endpoints to manage the metadata via Transfer operations?

It is not clear to me why we need section 6.3 in the proposal since it should be possible to use the returned metadata resource endpoint as any Transfer resource and be able to manipulate the target resource.


From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:23 PM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: 6411: proposal

Per my AI from the f2f, attached is a proposal for 6411 along the lines of what we talked about.  It adds one new section to the mex spec.

-Doug Davis
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 17:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:51 UTC