W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > August 2009

RE: 7206 minor update

From: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:27:29 +0000
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <503546C5699C1144BDEA0D0DFFE7F88107519AC3@TK5EX14MBXC112.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thanks for fixing this.

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:12 PM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: 7206 minor update


As I was doing 7206 I noticed that the words "recommended" and "should" appear in the new text we added.  It seemed clear to me that these did intent to be RFC2119 terms so I made them uppercase.  If there are any concerns with this please let me know and we'll open an issue to discuss.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
----- Forwarded by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM on 08/18/2009 05:10 PM -----
Doug Davis via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org

08/18/2009 05:10 PM

To

public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org

cc

Subject

WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies wsenum.xml,1.40,1.41 wseventing.xml,1.63,1.64 wsfrag.xml,1.5,1.6 wsmex.xml,1.37,1.38 wsrt.xml,1.30,1.31







Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv28591

Modified Files:
                wsenum.xml wseventing.xml wsfrag.xml wsmex.xml wsrt.xml
Log Message:
s/should/SHOULD
s/recommended/RECOMMENDED
for 7206


Index: wsrt.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsrt.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -d -r1.30 -r1.31
--- wsrt.xml                 18 Aug 2009 20:54:31 -0000                 1.30
+++ wsrt.xml                 18 Aug 2009 21:10:01 -0000                 1.31
@@ -654,8 +654,8 @@
     In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver
     of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has
     recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension,
-     it is recommended that the receiver add a corresponding extension
-     to the response message.  The definition of an extension should clearly
+     it is RECOMMENDED that the receiver add a corresponding extension
+     to the response message.  The definition of an extension SHOULD clearly
     specify how the extension that appears in the response correlates
     with that in the corresponding request.
    </p>

Index: wsmex.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsmex.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -d -r1.37 -r1.38
--- wsmex.xml                 18 Aug 2009 20:54:31 -0000                 1.37
+++ wsmex.xml                 18 Aug 2009 21:10:01 -0000                 1.38
@@ -675,8 +675,8 @@
     In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver
     of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has
     recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension,
-     it is recommended that the receiver add a corresponding extension
-     to the response message.  The definition of an extension should clearly
+     it is RECOMMENDED that the receiver add a corresponding extension
+     to the response message.  The definition of an extension SHOULD clearly
     specify how the extension that appears in the response correlates
     with that in the corresponding request.
    </p>

Index: wsfrag.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsfrag.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -d -r1.5 -r1.6
--- wsfrag.xml                 18 Aug 2009 20:54:31 -0000                 1.5
+++ wsfrag.xml                 18 Aug 2009 21:10:01 -0000                 1.6
@@ -421,8 +421,8 @@
     In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver
     of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has
     recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension,
-     it is recommended that the receiver add a corresponding extension
-     to the response message.  The definition of an extension should clearly
+     it is RECOMMENDED that the receiver add a corresponding extension
+     to the response message.  The definition of an extension SHOULD clearly
     specify how the extension that appears in the response correlates
     with that in the corresponding request.
    </p>

Index: wsenum.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsenum.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -d -r1.40 -r1.41
--- wsenum.xml                 18 Aug 2009 20:54:30 -0000                 1.40
+++ wsenum.xml                 18 Aug 2009 21:10:01 -0000                 1.41
@@ -334,8 +334,8 @@
      In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver
      of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has
      recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension,
-      it is recommended that the receiver add a corresponding extension
-      to the response message.  The definition of an extension should clearly
+      it is RECOMMENDED that the receiver add a corresponding extension
+      to the response message.  The definition of an extension SHOULD clearly
      specify how the extension that appears in the response correlates
      with that in the corresponding request.
     </p>

Index: wseventing.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wseventing.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.63
retrieving revision 1.64
diff -u -d -r1.63 -r1.64
--- wseventing.xml                 18 Aug 2009 20:54:30 -0000                 1.63
+++ wseventing.xml                 18 Aug 2009 21:10:01 -0000                 1.64
@@ -547,8 +547,8 @@
     In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver
     of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has
     recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension,
-     it is recommended that the receiver add a corresponding extension
-     to the response message.  The definition of an extension should clearly
+     it is RECOMMENDED that the receiver add a corresponding extension
+     to the response message.  The definition of an extension SHOULD clearly
     specify how the extension that appears in the response correlates
     with that in the corresponding request.
    </p>
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:28:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:51 UTC