W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > August 2009

RE: new snapshots

From: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:11:22 +0000
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <503546C5699C1144BDEA0D0DFFE7F88107519A87@TK5EX14MBXC112.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
My review comments on MEX and WS-ResourceTransfer. This completes my review. Thanks.

MEX

Issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6500 resolution states the following part:


[action]

  http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex/GetMetadata/Response

[Body]

  <mex:GetMetadataResponse ..>

      <mex:Metadata ...>

      ...

      </mex:Metadata>

      xs:any *

  </mex:GetMetadataResponse>

The latest draft of the MEX specification states

[Action]
  http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-mex/GetMetadataResponse
[Body]

 <mex:GetMetadataResponse>
   <mex:Metadata ...>
     xs:any*
   </mex:Metadata>

   xs:any*

</mex:GetMetadataResponse>

I believe the xs:any inside the <mex:Metadata> is extraneous.

WS-ResourceTransfer

Looks good.

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ram Jeyaraman
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:09 PM
To: Yves Lafon; public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: RE: new snapshots

Here are my review comments on the latest drafts of WS-Transfer, WS-Enumeration, and WS-Eventing. I am yet to review MEX and RT. Thanks.

WS-Transfer

Should the specification use WS-Fragment or WS-Fragments?

The change is highlighted in red.

[Body] /wst:Delete@Dialect="http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag"

The WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments]<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst-diff.html#WsFrag> specification defines this dialect URI. Use of this URI indicates that the contents of the Get element MUST be processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments]<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst-diff.html#WsFrag> specification.
The above  comment applies for the descriptions of the following attributes as well.

[Body] /wst:Put@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag
[Body] /wst:Create@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag

WS-Enumeration

The phrase "returning the EnumerateResponse. message." has a extra full stop after EnumerateResponse.

WS-Transfer

Looks good.



-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 7:02 AM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: new snapshots



See

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html



and the diffs from the june snapshots:

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html



--

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.



         ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:12:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:51 UTC